EAST AND WEST

In today’s polarized political climate, there is a prevailing narrative that liberals champion inclusivity, tolerance, and progressiveness. However, beneath the veneer of liberalism, despite claiming to champion the working class, so called liberals often exhibit a remarkable disconnect from their struggles and an elitist disdain for their way of life. These fake liberal elitists present themselves as paragons of virtue, but their true nature reveals a contemptuous attitude towards the working class that they claim to support.

Fake liberal elitists are often found in influential positions within the media, academia, and the political arena. They project an image of intellectual superiority and open-mindedness, using lofty rhetoric to promote social justice causes. However, their actions often betray their true motivations.

These individuals may appear cosmopolitan and global in their outlook, advocating for the rights of marginalized groups worldwide. They actively participate in international conferences, espouse the values of globalization, and present themselves as champions of multiculturalism. Yet, their support for global causes often masks a lack of concern for the struggles faced by their fellow citizens, particularly the working class.

One of the defining characteristics of fake liberal elitists is their contempt for the working class. While they claim to fight for social equality and justice, they often view those outside their privileged circles as crude, unenlightened, and unworthy of their attention or respect. The working class is portrayed as an ignorant mass incapable of comprehending the complexities of social issues.

Rather than engaging in meaningful dialogue with the working class, fake liberal elitists tend to talk down to them, dismissing their concerns as uneducated or even racist. This condescending attitude undermines any genuine attempt to bridge the divide between different socioeconomic groups and fosters an “us versus them” mentality that perpetuates division.

Fake liberal elitists cultivate a false sense of moral superiority, believing that their privileged upbringing or academic credentials give them a unique insight into societal issues. They use their perceived intellectual and cultural capital as a shield against criticism, dismissing any dissenting voices as ignorant or regressive.

Their supposed commitment to liberalism and tolerance often translates into a rigid adherence to a particular set of beliefs, leaving no room for genuine debate or alternative perspectives. This stifling of dissenting opinions only further alienates the working class, reinforcing the notion that their voices do not matter in the larger discourse.

Despite their claims of solidarity with the working class, fake liberal elitists often lead lives that are far removed from the realities of the people they claim to represent. Their affluence and privileged backgrounds enable them to live in exclusive neighbourhoods, attend elite institutions, and participate in lavish social events.

Their lifestyle choices and consumption patterns stand in stark contrast to the struggles faced by the working class, who often bear the brunt of economic hardships and limited opportunities. Yet, fake liberal elitists rarely engage with the working class outside of tokenistic gestures or photo opportunities, preferring to maintain the status quo that perpetuates their own privilege.

The existence of fake liberal elitists poses a significant challenge to the ideals of liberalism, tolerance, and inclusivity that they purport to champion. Their disdain for the working class and their hypocritical behaviour reveal an underlying elitism that undermines the principles they claim to uphold.

To truly address the divisions within society, it is crucial to challenge these fake liberal elitists and hold them accountable for their actions. Genuine progress requires a more inclusive approach that values the perspectives and experiences of all individuals, including the working class.

Only by dismantling the false narratives and elitist attitudes perpetuated by these individuals can we foster a more equitable society that addresses the needs and aspirations of all its members.